Here’s some I spotted earlier…the Festival of Architecture 2016 longlist is announced

Next year is a double whammy for me. Not only does Cumbernauld get a bus pass (The 60th Anniversary falls between 2016 and 2017-don’t ask, it’s complicated) but 2016 is also the Festival of Architecture, a year long celebration of Scotland’s best buildings. I am not an architect, and my interest in the field is new. But, by exploring my interest in place and psychogeography through the medium of  photography (!), I’ve taken a lot of pictures of buildings. There’s no elaborate process, I usually just try and capture buildings I like, with a strong preference for modernist and brutalist architecture emerging.

So it was with more than a smidgen of smugness that I realised, that many of my snaps feature buildings from the long list, contending for the title of best building of the century.  Alas, my mini ego-trip was shortlived. Maybe it’s obvious what makes a great building. Even as an ordinary (non-architect) person navigating cities and towns, maybe I have more architectural literacy than I realise? Perhaps it’s as simple as that good architectural design is easy to spot? These ideas warrant further exploration, but I’ll mull them over and come back to it some other post.

Putting my questions to one side, I am hopeful that more people will be able to think about the buildings in the places in which they live and travel, visit and work. With Assemble winning the Turner Prize and subsequent media furore; and the  FOA2016 coming up, maybe more ‘ordinary people’ will be switched on to the influence and potential of the buildings in our towns and cities, and  of the impact they have on our lives.

Scroll on to see a selection of my photographs of the longlisted buildings.

Arches and City Chambers, Glasgow. Watson, Salmond and Gray. 1923. 

The chambers. #glasgow #citylife #tourist #peoplemakeglasgow #nighttime #dslr #archilovers #architecture #georgesquare #pink

A post shared by Believe_in_utopia (@believe_in_utopia) on

1927. Bank of Scotland,St Vincent Street, Glasgow. James Miller.

1933. St Anne’s Roman Catholic Church, Dennistoun. Gillespie Kidd and Coia.

 

1954. Kilsyth Academy, Kilsyth. Basil Spence.

Those stairs up close. #staircase #stairs #sunflate #bnw #Kilsyth #kilsythacademy #architecture #modernism #modernist #artdeco

A post shared by Believe_in_utopia (@believe_in_utopia) on

 

1964. Glasgow College of building and printing, Cathedral Street, Glasgow. Wylie Shanks and Underwood. 

1970 BOAC building, Buchanan Street, Glasgow. Gillespie Kidd and Coia.

1974. University of Stirling, Bridge of Allan. RMJM.

1974. Phase III Housing, St George’s Road, Glasgow. Boswell Mitchell & Johnson.

1999. Homes for the future, the Green. Elder and Cannon.

The public will be able to vote for their favourite building from Spring 2016. There’s a development in Cumbernauld- must be the only houses in the town I’ve not got a picture of (yet)- that I’m tempted to vote for.

Have a look at the longlist (the link here) and let me know what you’ll be voting for. And are there are any obvious omissions from the list?

Advertisements

What’s it Called? Cumbernauld!

My interest in Utopias and psychogeography stems from growing up and living in Scotland’s third new town: Cumbernauld. If you are from the town, or even just owned a television set in the STV region during the eighties, you’ll be familiar with the title phrase. If you’ve never heard this enchanting catchphrase before,  then you can see the delightful piece of propaganda it originates from here.  As a current resident, I can confirm I’ll be asked ‘What’s it called?’ around 84% of the time I mention I live in Cumbernauld. But back to that advert, if the eighties and the decades before (see this from 1970) were all about shameless self-promotion, then how our fortunes changed by the time the new millennium came around.

A little snippet of some bad news:

Despite the weary interviewees in the news clip, it’s worth remembering that Cumbernauld was once hailed a success, at least by architects. In 1967, it won the R.S. Reynolds memorial prize for Community Architecture, beating off stiff competition from the much heralded town of Tapiola in Finland. The architects of Cumbernauld employed a variety of housing styles. In areas that already had some established housing , such as the small Cumbernauld Village and the farming settlement in Kildrum, some attempts were made to keep the scale and appearance of cottage style homes. These homes remain very successful and in demand both as sales on the property market and as social housing (right-to-buy ensured that plenty of the former and less of the latter remain). However, more experimental designs of home did not work as well. Many properties were built as low-rise, medium density housing with flat roofs and substandard materials. Dampness was a problem, and many of these blocks were either demolished or extensively refurbished.

Houses were also purposefully built to face onto gardens and public courtyards rather than the traditional design of homes facing each other. In addition, Cumbernauld planners anticipated a high level of car ownership, and as such there was a garage for nearly every home. To keep residents safe from traffic, many footbridges and underpasses were incorporated into the design, and  today you can still walk through the town without ever needing to cross the road. These are all design elements taken from the Radburn plan, pioneered in New Jersey. These once-lauded elements of town planning are the source of many of the complaints made about Cumbernauld. Not overlooking your neighbours sounds like a good thing until you consider that this makes crime harder to spot. Underpasses become popular places for drinkers to congregate, and some say the incidence of flashing in Cumbernauld was higher because the perpetrators had so many places to hide unseen by passing traffic.

But, by far the biggest architectural problem in Cumbernauld is the main building. The architects, lead by Geoffrey Copcutt, had a strong vision for the town centre, conceiving a large, monolithic concrete structure with different ‘decks’ for different purposes. The intention was that all retail, finance/administrative and leisure and social spaces would be housed in this building. Also incorporated into this megastructure was a level of premium penthouse apartments built on concrete stilts. The architects envisioned that all residents in the newly built housing schemes of Cumbernauld would be able to see the centre from their neighbourhoods. Unfortunately, only a fifth of the proposed centre was ever developed, meaning many of the envisioned uses never materialised. The penthouses were barely occupied, and given over to charity and business use early on. Now, they mostly lie empty, their porthole-like windows are never looked out of. Other parts of the building have been lobotomised, entrance ramps and walkways were hacked off to make way for the shed-like Antonine shopping Centre we were graced with in 2007.

What, we wonder, will become of the centre? Most call for it to be demolished and for us to start all over again. But, both Modernist and Brutalist architecture seem to be enjoying a resurgence, with people having a fresh appreciation for the honesty of the design principles. London now has a brutalist architecture map, St. Peter’s Seminary at Cardross has been reclaimed by NVA and Sheffield’s Park Hill Estate has been, in part, successfully regenerated (although not as social housing). My own dream would be for the penthouse part of the stucture to become some sort of public space, perhaps with community spaces and a museum. Students from around the world continue to be taught about Cumbernauld as one of the best realisations of modernist planning that was built. No-one is in denial about its problems but uncovering and disecting those issues too help us to understand how people like to live. If the powers-that-be dared to dream, then I think Cumbernauld’s megastructure could enjoy the sort of esteem and acclaim its architects once hoped it would have.

Whilst I wasn’t always a fan of the building, by understanding the ambition and ethos behind it, I have grown to love it. Have you been to the building? Or do you have memories of it? Is it worth saving? I’d love to know what others think.

Do you believe in Utopia?

Utopia.  A perfect place, with people living in harmonious physical and psychosocial conditions. I think it’s something we should try for. Yet I’m sure you’ll agree when I say I believe we’re a long way from realising the Utopian vision.

High-rise living: not Utopia.

I’ve carried out voluntary work for over 20 years.  I’ve previously spent time working with and learning from kids’ clubs, youth groups and befriending adults with disabilities. Latterly, I’ve  supported foreign students with their academic studies and provided consultancy support to charities. Professionally, I’ve been employed in the community development and education sector for over a decade. I’ve worked with some of the most marginalised people in our society. This has included young people with no qualifications; asylum seekers and refugees; lone parents; the long-term unemployed and people with mental health problems.

All of the roles described above have something in common.  All were carried out in geographical communities that experience ‘multiple deprivations’ ( I also live in such a place). Deprivation in this context means issues such as a high proportion of low income households, high youth unemployment, lower than average educational attainment, poor housing and high percentages of lone-parent households. In recent years, my interests and experiences  have led me to seek out higher education, grasping to put names to the things I knew I didn’t know I knew!  I now have  the privilege and benefit of a Community development degree, and I am currently working on my dissertation for an MSc in Teaching Adults.

Both my personal, educational and professional experiences, as described above,  have converged.  I  do understand the importance of the many separate yet interconnected community projects that try to improve society. But I often feel the physical reality of places are overlooked. Thankfully, asides from amassing £20k+ of student debt, my studies have also gifted me with a new tool-  Psychogeography. The exact definition is contested. But I think the term lends itself well to what I am interested in. That is,  exploring and documenting ‘place’ in an attempt to understand the way we live and the problems we face.  I started working towards this almost accidentally on instagram six months ago, capturing images to show the places I see. The questions and themes that emerged in some of my more imaginative and evocative images are the focus of this blog. They include:

  • Where are the places that inspire us?
  • How do people interact with the spaces that they inherit?
  • Who are the rule makers, rule breakers and rule keepers?
  • What evidence exists that people know better than planners?
  • What makes a space a rejected place?

So, pleased to meet you as I embark upon a psychogeographic jaunt and ramble. Mostly, I’ll focus on the beautifully complicated, friendly and gritty city of Glasgow. But there’s also a strong supporting role for Cumbernauld, my newtown hometown. I’m hoping to hear your thoughts along the way. The first thing I’d like to ask- do you believe in Utopia?